Machine Learning Development Companies

Machine learning companies build predictive systems — forecasting, scoring, classification, recommendation — and the data pipelines that keep them running. Compare vetted vendors, read reviews and request quotes.

Ratings Updated:
We verify reviews and evaluate companies.

Smart analytics system. Works with already installed cameras, keeps data confidential. Evaluate marketing campaigns - accurate data, graphs and heat maps help you calculate the tra…

softwareintegration

Saratov · Since 2019 · 1-10 employees

Joomla custom development. Website and online stores creation with Joomla.

websoftwareintegration

Webtronics is a full-service digital agency. Since 2010 we have been helping companies to develop their business online, get more applications at a lower price, expand their audien…

webmobilesoftwaredesignagenciesintegration
Min. project
$100+
websoftwareintegration
Min. project
$10k+

Developing digital products in Kazakhstan and Russia from 2021

softwareintegration
Min. project
$30k+

Emeryville · Since 2016 · 201-500 employees

All Ways of Quality Always

webmobilesoftwareintegration

New York · Since 2017 · 11-50 employees

Intactdia is a full-service web development and digital marketing agency dedicated to helping businesses thrive in the digital world. We provide innovative solutions in web develop…

webmobilesoftwaredesignagencies
Min. project
$300+
Hourly rate
$30–$150/hr

Development of Web applications, Mobile applications for iOS and Android, Desktop applications, UX/UI interfaces.

softwareintegration
Min. project
$3k+

For 15 years we have been developing and designing digital products, services and websites.We make B2B and D2C e-commerce, personal offices, information systems, portals.Among clie…

websoftwaredesignintegration
Min. project
$30k+

Since 2021 · 1-10 employees

webmobilesoftwaredesignagenciesintegration

Combining marketing tools for effective business development. We package goals into digital metrics and select tools to achieve them. Maximize the effectiveness of marketing invest…

webmobilesoftwaredesignagenciesintegration
Min. project
$3k+
webmobilesoftwaredesignintegration
Min. project
$3k+

Since 2019 · 11-50 employees

Increase business performance by creating and supporting comprehensive business solutions. Offer consultations, teach and implement sophisticated products, change processes, help u…

websoftware
Min. project
$20k+
Hourly rate
$50–$100/hr

Digital Habits is a trusted partner for business digitalization, not just a service provider. Our focus is constantly on technological innovation, with teams deeply immersed in the…

webmobilesoftwaredesignintegration

Irving · Since 2004 · 201-500 employees

Your Trusted Technology Partner

mobilesoftwareintegration

Ecosystem of solutions for automation and organization of work of lawyers and arbitration managers. Products: - monitoring of counterparties; - automation of work organization: RTC…

softwareintegration
Min. project
$100+
websoftwaredesignagenciesintegration
Min. project
$3k+

A team of over 200 thinkers with burning eyes ready to help business enthusiasts from all over the world in developing UI, web and mobile IOS and Android applications

webmobilesoftwaredesignintegration
Min. project
$30k+

Mobile development - design, cross-platform applications, android, ios;Web development - fronted, backend, web applications, pwa application, serverless applications;UX/UI design -…

webmobilesoftwareintegration

New York · Since 2010 · 51-200 employees

Best Software Development Company

webmobilesoftwareintegration

Create – Inspire – Deliver

webmobilesoftwaredesignagenciesintegration
Min. project
$500+
Hourly rate
$50–$99/hr

Kaunas · Since 2024 · 51-200 employees

Cluster of 7 IT companies from Lithuania, embodying Nordic values

webmobilesoftwareintegration
Min. project
€5k+
Hourly rate
€20–€120/hr

A team of young specialists. We are engaged in professional Web / iOS / Android development and accompany clients at all stages of product creation and support: prototyping, design…

webmobilesoftwaredesignagenciesintegration
Min. project
$3k+

Before you shortlist anyone

All calculators

The short answer

1,178 Machine learning companies are listed. 61% publish a minimum project budget; the median floor is $10k. Most work starts in the $3–10k range. Median published rate is $25/hr across 71 companies.

Best supplied: United States (182) · India (131) · Ukraine (59)

Recalculated 2026-11-11 from live profiles.

What it costs, by country

Each cell counts companies whose published minimum project budget falls in that band. Only countries with at least 5 listed companies appear.

Countryunder $3k$3–10k$10–20k$20–30k$30k+Median rate
United States182Widest choice527231655$40/hr
India131122131319$18/hr
Ukraine59—145104—
Germany31—2—51—
United Kingdom30—4449—
Netherlands28—44410—
Poland27—4456—
Canada91—1—3—
Armenia9—32———
Australia811—3——
Romania7—21———
Israel5—2————
How this table is built
  • Figures are minimum project budgets companies publish on their own profiles — the floor below which they decline work, not the price of a finished project.
  • USD only. Companies quote in six currencies and averaging across them produces a number nobody charges.
  • Budgets outside $300–$2,000,000 and rates outside $5–$500/hr are dropped as data-entry errors.
  • A country needs 5 listed companies for a row, and 5 published rates before a median rate is shown.

What will your budget reach?

Move the slider. Every figure below is a count of companies whose published minimum project budget sits at or under that amount.

$10k
$1k$250k

240 of 720 companies (33%) take projects at this size.

Where the entry thresholds sit

under $3k
22
$3–10k
218
$10–20k
164
$20–30k
137
$30k+
179

Goes furthest in United States — 32 companies

This says who will engage, not what your scope should cost. A budget that reaches most of the market still buys very different things depending on what you are building.

Who is focused, and who has proved it

Horizontal: how concentrated a company is on Machine learning. Vertical: how much checkable evidence stands behind it. 60 of 1178 companies are plotted — the rest have fewer than 2 evidence signals, so placing them would be guesswork.

LeadersEstablished generalistsSpecialistsEmergingFocus on Machine learning →Proven delivery →Double — 4 reviews, 13 projects, DR 23, 1.2 yrs listedSiberian.pro — 0 reviews, 18 projects, DR 17, 1.2 yrs listedAtwinta — 0 reviews, 105 projects, 1.2 yrs listedSimbirSoft — 26 reviews, 30 projects, DR 22, 1.2 yrs listedBureauBureau — 1 reviews, 12 projects, DR 52, 1.2 yrs listedBig Drop Inc — 1 reviews, 2 projects, DR 66, 1.2 yrs listedBig Drop IncFusion Tech — 4 reviews, 36 projects, DR 28, 1.2 yrs listedFueled — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 70, 1.2 yrs listedFueledThe Digital Embassy — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 64, 1.2 yrs listedThe Digital EmbassyVergani&Gasco — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 64, 1.2 yrs listedVergani&GascoIntellectsoft — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 67, 1.2 yrs listedIntellectsoftmoodley — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 68, 1.2 yrs listedmoodleyCodestetic — 3 reviews, 2 projects, DR 32, 1.2 yrs listedDELUCKS — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 63, 1.2 yrs listedArticul — 1 reviews, 0 projects, DR 55, 1.2 yrs listedndave — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 66, 1.2 yrs listedDMI (Digital Management, Inc.) — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 68, 1.2 yrs listedLOOP — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 61, 1.2 yrs listedApadmi — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 63, 1.2 yrs listedIflexion — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 63, 1.2 yrs listedBASICS09 — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 60, 1.2 yrs listedLounge Lizard — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 61, 1.2 yrs listediOnline — 0 reviews, 0 projects, DR 65, 1.2 yrs listedOpenXcell — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 56, 1.2 yrs listedE-sites — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 61, 1.2 yrs listedpooliestudios — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 60, 1.2 yrs listedNewism — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 57, 1.2 yrs listedY Media Labs — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 59, 1.2 yrs listedSFCD — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 55, 1.2 yrs listedroyalkomm — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 54, 1.2 yrs listedIQ Dev — 0 reviews, 11 projects, DR 22, 1.2 yrs listedAnadea — 1 reviews, 8 projects, DR 38, 1.2 yrs listedDefa — 0 reviews, 6 projects, DR 50, 1.2 yrs listedUZIK — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 60, 1.2 yrs listedINTERSOG — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 52, 1.2 yrs listedworry free labs — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 58, 1.2 yrs listedProxation GmbH — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 55, 1.2 yrs listedMetropolis Creative — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 49, 1.2 yrs listedACCROACHCODE — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 52, 1.2 yrs listedfimbim — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 50, 1.2 yrs listedPush. — 0 reviews, 4 projects, DR 41, 1.2 yrs listedSofteq Development — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 50, 1.2 yrs listedQulix Systems — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 51, 1.2 yrs listedNewedge — 0 reviews, 0 projects, DR 58, 1.2 yrs listedNetbasics — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 49, 1.2 yrs listedParasol Island — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 53, 1.2 yrs listedHyperlink InfoSystem — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 70, 1.2 yrs listedMubaloo — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 49, 1.2 yrs listedStanfy — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 47, 1.2 yrs listedVITEB — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 46, 1.2 yrs listedGlobo — 0 reviews, 0 projects, DR 54, 1.2 yrs listedkoombea — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 46, 1.2 yrs listedNFM — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 45, 1.2 yrs listedOliver Brux — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 49, 1.2 yrs listedNew Bamboo — 0 reviews, 2 projects, DR 48, 1.2 yrs listedImpressionDP — 0 reviews, 3 projects, DR 42, 1.2 yrs listedGaj Somasundaram — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 47, 1.2 yrs listedconvoy — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 49, 1.2 yrs listedInfinity Infoway Pvt Ltd — 0 reviews, 1 projects, DR 70, 1.2 yrs listedxyzettgraphix. — 0 reviews, 0 projects, DR 47, 1.2 yrs listed
How a company is placed
  • Focus is the inverse of how many categories a company claims, blended with the share of its portfolio tagged with this one. A firm listing three technologies is concentrated; a firm listing forty also appears here.
  • Proven delivery adds published reviews (to 20), portfolio projects (to 25), Ahrefs Domain Rating (to 60) and years listed (to 10). Each is capped so no single signal carries a company to the top.
  • Positions are relative to the other companies on this page: the median company sits at the centre of each axis, so a quadrant boundary means "ahead of half the companies listed here". Raw scores are in each bubble's tooltip.
  • Deliberately excluded: the star rating, which sits in too narrow a band to separate anyone; the editorial rank, which is a hand-assigned sort weight; and paid verification, which does not move anything on this chart.
Leaders:
Concentrated on this work and with the record to show for it.
Specialists:
This is most of what they do, but the public evidence is still thin.
Established generalists:
A substantial track record, spread across many categories.
Emerging:
Building both focus and evidence.

Customer Reviews about Machine learning

ENCYPHERS

New Hyde Park
GK co | USA
Meg C, Co- Founder

The new email flows felt elevated, aligned with our brand identity, and created a more seamless experience for customers after subscribing and making a purchase. Communication throughout the project was organized and collaborative, and the final result added a much stronger retention layer to our ecommerce experience.

Futuro Studio

Water Elements

Great team!

MiaoWebs

MiaoWebs

Where machine learning still pays best

Generative AI takes the attention, but classic supervised learning remains the highest-return category in most industries, because the problems are narrow, the metrics are unambiguous and the models are cheap to run. If you can state the target variable in one sentence and you have two years of labelled history, machine learning is usually the right tool.

  • Forecasting. Demand, inventory, cash flow and staffing, at SKU or location granularity.
  • Scoring and risk. Credit, fraud, churn and lead quality, with the explainability regulators and reviewers require.
  • Recommendation and ranking. Product feeds, search relevance, matching and dynamic pricing.
  • Predictive maintenance. Sensor and telemetry models that flag failures before they stop a line.
  • MLOps. Feature stores, training pipelines, drift monitoring and retraining — the part that decides whether a model survives its first year.

How to evaluate an ML partner

  • Ask for the baseline. A team that cannot tell you how much their model beats a simple heuristic has not measured the thing that matters.
  • Ask about the offline-to-online gap: how validation accuracy translated to business metrics in a past project.
  • Check monitoring: drift detection, retraining triggers and what happens when input data silently changes shape.
  • Confirm data readiness early. Most ML timelines slip on access, labelling and quality, not modelling.
  • Get deployment in scope from day one — batch, real-time or edge — because it dictates the whole architecture.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much data do we need?
For tabular classification and forecasting, a few thousand labelled examples per class is a workable start, and two full seasonal cycles matter more than raw volume for time series. Fine-tuning a pretrained model for vision or text can work with a few hundred well-labelled examples.
What does an ML project cost?
A feasibility study with an offline model is typically $10,000–$35,000. A deployed system with pipelines, monitoring and retraining usually runs $60,000–$250,000, plus roughly 20% per year to keep it accurate as data drifts.
How long until a model is in production?
Three to five months is typical: four to six weeks on data access and preparation, three to four weeks on modelling, and the rest on integration, monitoring and the review the business needs before it trusts the output.
Machine learning or an LLM?
If the output is a number, a class or a ranking and you have historical labels, classic ML is cheaper, faster and more accurate. Use an LLM when the input is unstructured language or images and writing explicit rules or labels is impractical.

Why Trust Wadline

Wadline is a trusted platform for finding IT companies and agencies. We help businesses make confident, data-backed decisions through verified reviews, detailed portfolios, and transparent company information.

Verified Client Reviews

Every review on Wadline undergoes verification. We confirm the authenticity of client feedback by cross-checking project details, timelines, and results to ensure credibility.

Data-Driven Rankings

Our company rankings are powered by data. Each company is evaluated based on expertise, experience, portfolio quality, and client satisfaction to help you find the right partner.

Global Reach & Recognition

Wadline connects businesses worldwide with reliable tech partners. Our platform features companies from multiple countries, helping you find local or international expertise.

Full Transparency

From verified reviews and portfolio highlights to service focus and pricing, Wadline provides a comprehensive view of every company to help you make informed decisions.

We evaluate service providers using a structured methodology that combines client interviews, portfolio analysis, and market presence assessment.

Learn about our methodology →

Explore with AI

Get an AI-powered summary of top companies in this category. Click any service below to analyze this page with your preferred AI assistant.