TypeScript – Developers
Looking for TypeScript experts? Explore our catalogue of top IT companies and freelancers specializing in TypeScript development. Find the right vendor for your project today.
- Min. project
- $10k+
- Min. project
- $3k+
Since our company was founded, we've helped our clients find exceptional solutions for their businesses by creating memorable brands and digital products. Our knowledge grows every…
- Min. project
- $10k+
We are a young team with a boiling blood, which is ready to do the best projects and squeeze the maximum out of the idea. We create sites penetrating into the sphere of the client…
- Min. project
- $100+
Experts in food tech, e-commerce and marketplaces. We work with the leaders of the Russian market and reduce their costs for web and mobile application development and customer ser…
- Min. project
- $3k+
For over 14 years we provide: Complex Software Development. Consulting. Audit. Outsourcing. At Acropolium we have built a wide range of B2B and B2C software solutions for such doma…
- Min. project
- $10k+
- Min. project
- $10k+
Before you shortlist anyone
All calculatorsThe short answer
339 TypeScript companies are listed. 68% publish a minimum project budget; the median floor is $10k. Most work starts in the $10–20k range. Median published rate is $25/hr across 17 companies.
Best supplied: Russia (118) · United States (55) · India (38)
Recalculated 2026-09-24 from live profiles.
What it costs, by country
Each cell counts companies whose published minimum project budget falls in that band. Only countries with at least 5 listed companies appear.
| Country | under $3k | $3–10k | $10–20k | $20–30k | $30k+ | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russia118Widest choice | 1 | 15 | 27 | 22 | 13 | — |
| United States55 | 1 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 15 | — |
| India38 | — | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Poland18 | — | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Belarus18 | 3 | 4 | — | 3 | 1 | $20/hr |
| Ukraine16 | — | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | — |
| United Kingdom8 | — | 1 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Romania5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — |
How this table is built
- Figures are minimum project budgets companies publish on their own profiles — the floor below which they decline work, not the price of a finished project.
- USD only. Companies quote in six currencies and averaging across them produces a number nobody charges.
- Budgets outside $300–$2,000,000 and rates outside $5–$500/hr are dropped as data-entry errors.
- A country needs 5 listed companies for a row, and 5 published rates before a median rate is shown.
What will your budget reach?
Move the slider. Every figure below is a count of companies whose published minimum project budget sits at or under that amount.
68 of 232 companies (29%) take projects at this size.
Where the entry thresholds sit
- under $3k
- 7
- $3–10k
- 61
- $10–20k
- 62
- $20–30k
- 50
- $30k+
- 52
Goes furthest in Russia — 16 companies
This says who will engage, not what your scope should cost. A budget that reaches most of the market still buys very different things depending on what you are building.
Who is focused, and who has proved it
Horizontal: how concentrated a company is on TypeScript. Vertical: how much checkable evidence stands behind it. 60 of 339 companies are plotted — the rest have fewer than 2 evidence signals, so placing them would be guesswork.
- SoftMediaLabLeaders
- CSSChopperLeaders
- DashBouquet DevelopmentLeaders
- ElinextLeaders
- AnadeaLeaders
- RubyGarageLeaders
How a company is placed
- Focus is the inverse of how many categories a company claims, blended with the share of its portfolio tagged with this one. A firm listing three technologies is concentrated; a firm listing forty also appears here.
- Proven delivery adds published reviews (to 20), portfolio projects (to 25), Ahrefs Domain Rating (to 60) and years listed (to 10). Each is capped so no single signal carries a company to the top.
- Positions are relative to the other companies on this page: the median company sits at the centre of each axis, so a quadrant boundary means "ahead of half the companies listed here". Raw scores are in each bubble's tooltip.
- Deliberately excluded: the star rating, which sits in too narrow a band to separate anyone; the editorial rank, which is a hand-assigned sort weight; and paid verification, which does not move anything on this chart.
- Leaders:
- Concentrated on this work and with the record to show for it.
- Specialists:
- This is most of what they do, but the public evidence is still thin.
- Established generalists:
- A substantial track record, spread across many categories.
- Emerging:
- Building both focus and evidence.
Customer Reviews about TypeScript
MOSKVA PRODUCTION
Благодарим команду креативного видеопродакшн-агентства ООО «МЕДИА ПРОДАКШН ГРУПП» за профессионально оказанные услуги по созданию видео. Остались под хорошим впечатлением от уровня вашего профессионализма, отмечаем ваш ответственный подход и искреннее стремление наполнить рынок эффективными качественными видео. Отдельного упоминания заслуживает оперативность, с которой вы работаете и решаете спорные ситуации, и способность находить нестандартные пути. Мы настроены на продолжения совместной работы и желаем вам успехов.
Clickmedia
Для меня Clickmedia — это пример компании, где внимание уделяется не только результату, но и качеству рабочей среды. Комфортный офис, продуманная организация пространства, необходимое оборудование и приятные бытовые условия делают ежедневную работу более удобной и продуктивной. Все это создает ощущение порядка и профессионального подхода. В такой среде легче концентрироваться на задачах и сохранять высокий уровень вовлеченности. Это важное преимущество компании как работодателя.
Web Chemists
Заказывали у Web-Химиков работы по сайту и дальнейшей оптимизации. До этого уже был опыт с другими исполнителями, поэтому подход сравнить есть с чем. Здесь понравилась организованность: сначала собрали информацию, уточнили цели, потом предложили понятный план действий. В процессе не пропадали, держали связь и нормально реагировали на замечания. Отдельно отмечу, что не было ощущения, будто тебе просто продают услугу — чувствовалось, что люди реально погружены в проект. По итогу сайт стал удобнее, а по продвижению начали появляться заметные сдвиги. Впечатление положительное, работать было комфортно.
Portfolio Projects
Why Trust Wadline
Wadline is a trusted platform for finding IT companies and agencies. We help businesses make confident, data-backed decisions through verified reviews, detailed portfolios, and transparent company information.
Verified Client Reviews
Every review on Wadline undergoes verification. We confirm the authenticity of client feedback by cross-checking project details, timelines, and results to ensure credibility.
Data-Driven Rankings
Our company rankings are powered by data. Each company is evaluated based on expertise, experience, portfolio quality, and client satisfaction to help you find the right partner.
Global Reach & Recognition
Wadline connects businesses worldwide with reliable tech partners. Our platform features companies from multiple countries, helping you find local or international expertise.
Full Transparency
From verified reviews and portfolio highlights to service focus and pricing, Wadline provides a comprehensive view of every company to help you make informed decisions.
We evaluate service providers using a structured methodology that combines client interviews, portfolio analysis, and market presence assessment.
Learn about our methodology →Explore with AI
Get an AI-powered summary of top companies in this category. Click any service below to analyze this page with your preferred AI assistant.